9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
1. Whether the land in question is wakf land and should be excluded from the net wealth of the assessee for wealth-tax assessment purposes. Detailed Analysis: The case involved a dispute over 480 bighas of land containing a masjid and imambara within a larger agricultural land/grove in Uttar Pradesh. The assessee claimed that the disputed land was wakf property, supported by a registered deed made in 1970. The Wealth Tax Officer (WTO) initially rejected the claim, adding the land's value to the assessee's net wealth. The assessee appealed to the Appellate Assistant Commissioner (AAC), who found merit in the claim but remanded the matter back to the WTO for further examination due to insufficient evidence presented by the assessee. The WTO maintained his decision, citing various grounds, including the lack of pre-1970 documentary evidence, non-registration under relevant wakf acts, and failure to prove income usage for religious purposes. The AAC, in a subsequent appeal, accepted the claim of an oral wakf by user, emphasizing that registration was not necessary for such wakfs. The AAC ruled in favor of the assessee, concluding that the disputed land's inclusion in the net wealth was unjustified. In the final appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), the department argued against the AAC's decision, contending that post-1970 evidence was irrelevant for the assessment year in question. The assessee's counsel highlighted the historical establishment of the wakf and the nature of wakf by user, referencing legal provisions and relevant case law. The ITAT analyzed the evidence, emphasizing the validity of oral wakfs and wakfs by user, noting that registration under wakf acts was not mandatory for their existence. The ITAT upheld the AAC's order, emphasizing the long-standing oral wakf by immemorial user, supported by historical statements and official documentation. The tribunal ruled that the disputed land qualified as wakf property and should not be considered part of the assessee's wealth for the relevant assessment year. Consequently, the department's appeal was dismissed, affirming the exclusion of the wakf land from the assessee's net wealth.
|
