9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
1. Disallowance of interest payment pertaining to debit balances of partners. 2. Inclusion of service charges in export turnover for deduction under section 80HHC. Analysis: 1. Interest Payment Disallowance: The dispute arises regarding the disallowance of interest payment of Rs. 20,175 pertaining to the debit balance of partners. The DCIT(A) deleted this addition, stating that the profit accrued during the year should be considered, and there was no justified reason to disallow the interest. The Tribunal agreed, emphasizing that the profit was available to the assessee during the year, even though ascertained at year-end. The disallowance was rightly deleted, and the amount was excluded from the profit for deduction under section 80HHC. 2. Inclusion of Service Charges: The second issue revolves around the inclusion of service charges in the export turnover for deduction under section 80HHC. The Assessing Officer reduced the service charges from the business income, arguing they were not export profits. The DCIT(A) upheld this decision, stating that service charges not received in convertible foreign exchange could not be part of export turnover. However, the Tribunal noted that the service charges were profits of the business and should be considered in the profit computation under the head "business or profession." Section 80HHC allows deduction for profits derived from export, and the service charges should not be excluded if they are part of the business profits. 3. Legal Interpretation of Section 80HHC: Section 80HHC provides deductions for profits derived from the export of goods or merchandise. The Tribunal analyzed the provisions of sub-section (3) of section 80HHC, which outlines how export profits should be computed. It was highlighted that the profit derived from export should be considered in proportion to the export turnover concerning the total turnover of the business. The Tribunal emphasized that the statutory formula provided by the legislature must be followed to determine the profit derived from the business of exporting goods or merchandise. 4. Application of Section 80AB: The Tribunal addressed the revenue's argument regarding the application of section 80AB, which clarifies the computation of deductions under various sections, including section 80HHC. It was concluded that the profit derived from export, as defined under section 80HHC, should be the basis for deduction. The Tribunal rejected the revenue's contention that the profit computation should also consider export profit, emphasizing that the statutory formula under section 80HHC(3) must be adhered to. 5. Conclusion: The Tribunal dismissed the revenue's appeal, upholding the DCIT(A)'s order. It was determined that the service charges should not have been excluded from the profit calculation for deduction under section 80HHC. The Tribunal affirmed that the assessee's claimed deduction of Rs. 3,42,277 was in accordance with the law, emphasizing the statutory provisions governing the computation of export profits for deduction purposes.
|
