9911796707
|
Home
Issues: Valuation of unquoted equity shares of companies for assessment years 1963-64 to 1974-75, 1978-79, and 1979-80 under rule 1D of Wealth-tax Rules, 1957.
In this judgment by the Appellate Tribunal ITAT BOMBAY-A, the primary issue revolved around the valuation of unquoted equity shares of companies for various assessment years. The assessee, an individual, held unquoted equity shares of companies, which were valued by the WTO under rule 1D of the Wealth-tax Rules, 1957. The AAC, on appeal, held that rule 1D was not the appropriate method for valuation of these shares and directed the valuation to be done in accordance with Board's Circular No. 332A, dated 31-3-1982, with a modification in the rate of capitalization. The revenue challenged this decision, arguing that rule 1D was mandatory for valuation of unquoted equity shares of non-investment companies. The assessee's counsel contended that the income capitalization method based on profit-earning capacity was the correct approach, citing relevant legal precedents. The departmental representative argued that the Board's Circular No. 332A applied only to specific types of companies, not the ones under consideration, and that the rate of capitalization directed by the AAC was incorrect. The assessee's counsel countered, emphasizing that the companies in question were going concerns, and the income capitalization method was appropriate based on legal rulings. The departmental representative also raised the issue of undisclosed income by the Jalan group, suggesting it should be factored into the valuation. The Tribunal analyzed the arguments, considering the nature of the companies, the profit-earning capacity, and the appropriate rate of capitalization. The Tribunal concluded that the income capitalization method was the correct approach for valuing the unquoted equity shares of the companies in question, as they were going concerns with stable profit-earning capacity. It held that rule 1D was not mandatory and that the Board's Circular did not apply in this scenario. The Tribunal determined that a 10% rate of return should be used for capitalization instead of the 12% directed by the AAC, considering the nature of share income and value appreciation. It directed the WTO to consider both disclosed and undisclosed profits of the companies in the valuation process. Ultimately, the appeals filed by the revenue were partly allowed, with directions for the valuation of shares as per the Tribunal's findings.
|
