9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
- Appeal filed by Revenue against CWT (A) order. - Exclusion of present value of deferred annuity policies and outstanding professional fees from assessee's net wealth. Analysis: 1. The appeal was filed by the Revenue against the order of the CWT (A) in Bombay. The grievance raised was the exclusion of the present value of deferred annuity policies and outstanding professional fees from the assessee's net wealth. 2. The Revenue's representative argued that the deferred annuity policies should be considered an asset and included in the net wealth based on a Tribunal decision in a similar case. He also referred to a High Court ruling stating that outstanding professional fees should be included in the net wealth regardless of the accounting system used. 3. On the other hand, the assessee's counsel contended that the issues were already addressed in previous Tribunal decisions and should not be reconsidered. He argued that the High Court ruling cited by the Revenue was not directly applicable to the present case involving a film artist. 4. The Tribunal noted that the previous decisions cited by both parties were not directly relevant to the present case. After careful consideration, the Tribunal held that the present value of deferred annuity policies and outstanding professional fees should not be included in the assessee's net wealth, as per the CWT (A) order. 5. The Tribunal agreed with the assessee's counsel that the High Court ruling was not directly applicable to the present case involving a film artist. They also emphasized that Tribunal decisions should not be overturned without valid reasons. Therefore, the outstanding professional fees were rightly excluded from the assessee's net wealth by the CWT (A). 6. In conclusion, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the Revenue, upholding the CWT (A) order to exclude the present value of deferred annuity policies and outstanding professional fees from the assessee's net wealth.
|
