Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 1991 (4) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1991 (4) TMI 166 - AT - Income Tax

Issues:
Leviability of interest under section 139(8) for a registered firm in the assessment year 1984-85.

Analysis:
The department filed an appeal against the CIT(A)'s order regarding the levy of interest under section 139(8) for the assessment year 1984-85. The Assessing Officer rectified the assessment order under section 154 to charge interest under section 139(8) as it was not initially charged. The assessee contended that no interest was payable as a refund was due based on the regular assessment. The CIT(A) held in favor of the assessee, emphasizing that interest under section 139(8) could not be charged if no tax was payable after considering advance tax and TDS. The CIT(A) highlighted the purpose of section 139(8) to ensure timely filing of returns and payment of interest only when tax is due after considering all payments made.

The department argued that the CIT(A) misinterpreted Explanation 2 to section 139(8) applicable for the assessment year 1984-85. They relied on decisions of the Bombay High Court to support their stance. On the other hand, the assessee relied on a Supreme Court decision to support their position that no interest should be charged when the entire tax liability is covered by advance tax payments. The tribunal analyzed the provisions of section 139(8) and the relevant explanations. They concluded that the CIT(A) erred in applying the old Explanation 2 and that the interest was correctly levied under section 139(8) as per the law applicable for the assessment year 1984-85.

The tribunal distinguished the Supreme Court decision cited by the assessee, as it pertained to an earlier provision of section 139(8) and was not relevant to the current case. They upheld the department's appeal, emphasizing the applicability of the current law and the Bombay High Court decisions supporting the levy of interest under section 139(8) for registered firms. Consequently, the tribunal reversed the CIT(A)'s order and reinstated the interest charged under section 139(8) for the registered firm in the assessment year 1984-85.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates