9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
1. Allowance of bad debts as a loss incidental to business. 2. Entitlement to weighted deduction under section 35B. 3. Expenditure on provision of ordinary hospitality not considered entertainment expense. Issue 1: The appeal by the Revenue was against the order of the AAC allowing a deduction of Rs. 26,866 as bad debts due from Shri K.P. Bhatt. The assessee firm, engaged in the export business, claimed that the bad debts arose from advances made to Shri Bhatt for the supply of hand-embroidered batwas. The ITO disallowed the claim, stating the advances were not related to specific orders and that legal steps were not taken to recover the debt. The AAC, after examining Shri Bhatt, concluded that the claim was a loss incidental to the business. The ITAT upheld the AAC's decision, noting the efforts made by the assessee to recover the debt and the impracticality of legal action against Shri Bhatt, confirming the deduction as a legitimate business loss. Issue 2: The second ground of appeal concerned the entitlement to weighted deduction under section 35B for commission paid to Shri D.C. Joshi. The assessee, an exporter of various goods, claimed the deduction for payments made to Shri Joshi, who played a crucial role in developing the export market for rayon textiles. The ITO rejected the claim, citing that the expenditure was incurred in India. The AAC allowed the deduction, considering the specialized services rendered by Shri Joshi in building the export business. The ITAT upheld the AAC's decision, citing a precedent that any expenditure incurred in India in connection with exports is entitled to weighted deduction, confirming the allowance of the deduction. Issue 3: The final ground of appeal related to the treatment of expenditure on provision of ordinary hospitality to customers as entertainment expenses. The AAC held that such expenditure was not in the nature of entertainment and deleted the addition made by the ITO for entertainment expenses. The ITAT agreed with the AAC, referencing a recent decision of the Bombay High Court, confirming that the expenditure on ordinary hospitality to customers should not be classified as entertainment expenses. Consequently, the ITAT dismissed the departmental appeal, upholding the AAC's decision on this issue as well.
|
