9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
1. Whether there is a dissolution of the firm or a change in the constitution of the firm? 2. Whether one assessment or two assessments should be made for the firm? Detailed Analysis: 1. The case involved a dispute regarding the nature of the event that took place in the firm - whether it was a dissolution or a change in the constitution. The assessee argued for two assessments, claiming dissolution, while the department argued for one assessment, asserting a change in constitution. The Tribunal examined the dissolution deed and concluded that the dissolution was genuine, supporting the assessee's position. 2. The Tribunal referred to a Full Bench decision of the Andhra Pradesh High Court, which held that in cases of firm dissolution, two assessments should be made. The court explained that under Section 187 of the Income Tax Act, if a firm ceases to exist due to dissolution, there cannot be a mere change in constitution. The court differentiated between Sections 187, 188, and 189, stating that Section 187 applies when there is a change in constitution but the firm continues, which was not the case here. The Tribunal also noted a contrary view by the Punjab and Haryana High Court but emphasized that in case of conflicting interpretations, the one favorable to the assessee should be adopted. 3. Ultimately, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that two assessments should be made due to the dissolution of the firm, not a mere change in constitution. The orders of the lower authorities were set aside, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee.
|
