9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Appeal against deletion of addition made by ITO. Analysis: The appeal pertains to the assessment year 1976-77, where the only ground taken is the deletion of an addition of Rs. 41,887 by the Commissioner (A). The assessee, a registered firm, had taken loans from two lenders who confirmed the transactions as havala entries. Despite providing details and contending the genuineness of the loans, the ITO added the loan amounts to the income along with interest. The assessee, while offering to accept the addition, conditioned it on no penalty under section 271(1)(c). The Commissioner (A) observed that the assessee had discharged its burden of proof, leading to the appeal by the Department. The Department contended that the assessment without further investigation cannot be sustained, acknowledging the ITO's error in acting upon the conditional offer made by the assessee. On the other hand, the assessee's representative argued that by providing loan details, the initial burden of proof was met. However, the Tribunal found that the ITO erred in assuming the assessee's willingness to accept the addition, especially when the condition attached was not agreed upon. The Tribunal emphasized the need for independent investigation by the ITO, considering the particulars provided by the assessee regarding the loans and the lenders' tax assessments. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the Commissioner (A)'s order and directed the matter to be re-evaluated by the ITO in accordance with the law. The Tribunal highlighted the importance of the ITO making an independent decision based on a thorough investigation, rather than relying on the conditional offer made by the assessee. The decision emphasized the need for proper assessment procedures and the importance of factual verification in tax matters.
|
