2001 (4) TMI 169 - AT - Income Tax

Summary

Issues Involved:
1. Applicability of Section 158BC.
2. Computation of undisclosed income.
3. Addition of alleged payment u/s 69C.
4. Lease transactions with PSEB and RSEB.
5. Interest liability u/s 158BFA(1).
6. Surcharge on tax rate.

Summary:

1. Applicability of Section 158BC:
The learned CIT(A) erred in holding that provisions of section 158BC of the Income-tax Act, 1961 are applicable in the case of the appellant-company.

2. Computation of Undisclosed Income:
The CIT(A) confirmed the Assessing Officer's action in computing undisclosed income for the block period at Rs. 11,89,89,975, against the appellant-company's declaration of Nil.

3. Addition of Alleged Payment u/s 69C:
The CIT(A) confirmed the addition of Rs. 25 lakhs u/s 69C for alleged payment to M/s. National Plastics Industries Ltd. The assessee argued that there were no entries of either the cash discount or any other payment made or received in its books of account apart from the advance of Rs. 2 crores received and the sale of only two machines. The Tribunal held that the expenditure of Rs. 25 lakhs should be allowed as a business expenditure u/s 37(1) of the Act and deleted the addition.

4. Lease Transactions with PSEB and RSEB:
The CIT(A) confirmed the disallowance of depreciation on assets leased to PSEB and RSEB, considering the transactions as financial arrangements rather than true leases. The Tribunal, however, allowed the depreciation claim, stating that the transactions were genuine sale and leaseback arrangements and the assessee is the owner of the assets, entitled to claim depreciation.

5. Interest Liability u/s 158BFA(1):
The CIT(A) held the assessee liable for interest u/s 158BFA. However, the Tribunal found that the return was filed within the time allowed, thus, the assessee is not liable for any interest under section 158BFA.

6. Surcharge on Tax Rate:
The CIT(A) held that surcharge is chargeable on the tax rate of 60% on the undisclosed income. The Tribunal, however, noted that for the relevant assessment year 1998-99, no surcharge is leviable as per the provisions of Part III of the First Schedule of Finance Act, 1997, and directed the Assessing Officer to delete the surcharge levied.

Conclusion:
The appeal was partly allowed, with significant relief granted on issues related to the addition u/s 69C, depreciation on leased assets, interest liability, and surcharge.