9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved:
1. Determination of the sale price of the property for capital gains calculation. 2. Allowability of certain expenses as deductions for capital gains. Detailed Analysis: 1. Determination of the Sale Price of the Property for Capital Gains Calculation: The primary issue was whether the sale price of the property for capital gains should be Rs. 1,95,000 as declared by the assessee or Rs. 2,74,200 as estimated by the Income Tax Officer (ITO) under Section 52(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. - Assessee's Argument: The property was sold as per an agreement dated 21st April 1964, at a price of Rs. 50 per sq. yd., and the delay in execution of the conveyance deed was due to litigation. Therefore, the sale price should be based on the 1964 agreement. - ITO's Argument: The transfer date is 25th March 1975, and the market value on this date should be considered. The ITO did not accept the 1964 agreement price due to various reasons, including the lack of mention of the agreement in the conveyance deed and the change in parties involved. The CIT(A) concluded that the provisions of Section 52(2) were not applicable as the sale price was agreed upon in 1964, and the property was finally transferred after ten years due to litigation. The Tribunal upheld this view, stating: - The onus is on the Revenue to prove that the sale price stated in the sale deed is less than what was actually exchanged. - There was no material evidence showing that the price in the sale deed was understated. - The sale should be considered as per the 1964 agreement, not the 1975 conveyance date. Therefore, the Tribunal confirmed the CIT(A)'s order, determining the capital gains based on the sale price of Rs. 1,95,000. 2. Allowability of Certain Expenses as Deductions for Capital Gains: The second issue was whether expenses amounting to Rs. 17,000, Rs. 25,000, and Rs. 20,000 should be allowed as deductions for capital gains calculation. - Rs. 17,000: Claimed as litigation fees paid to solicitors for defending suits to clear the title deeds. - Tribunal's Decision: Allowed the deduction, agreeing that the expenditure was incurred to transfer the property free from encumbrances, thus necessary for the transfer. - Rs. 25,000: Paid to settle cases related to the property. - Tribunal's Decision: Allowed the deduction, as the payment was necessary to clear the title and transfer the property. - Rs. 20,000: Claimed to have been paid out of court to settle a claim of adverse possession. - Tribunal's Decision: Disallowed the deduction due to lack of evidence. The assessee failed to provide a receipt or any substantial proof of payment. The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)'s order regarding the Rs. 17,000 and Rs. 25,000 deductions, confirming the ITO's decision to allow these expenses. However, it upheld the CIT(A)'s decision to disallow the Rs. 20,000 deduction due to insufficient evidence. Conclusion: - The appeal of the Revenue was dismissed, confirming the sale price for capital gains at Rs. 1,95,000. - The appeal of the assessee was partly allowed, permitting deductions for Rs. 17,000 and Rs. 25,000, but disallowing the Rs. 20,000 deduction due to lack of proof.
|
