1980 (12) TMI 81 - AT - Income Tax

Summary

Issues:
- Appeal against the assessment of income from undisclosed sources
- Discrepancy in agricultural income shown by the assessee
- Failure to consider all evidence by the ITO
- Justification of assessment of income from undisclosed sources

Analysis:

The appeal was filed against the assessment of Rs. 7,500 as income from undisclosed sources for the assessment year 1964-65. The original assessment included this amount as income from undisclosed sources as the memorandum book of agricultural income produced by the assessee was deemed unreliable by the Income Tax Officer (ITO). The ITO observed that the memorandum book seemed to have been written up at a stretch. The ld. AAC initially deleted this addition, but the IT Tribunal, Allahabad Bench, remanded the matter back for further investigation due to insufficient evidence provided by the assessee.

The matter was again restored to the ITO for reconsideration. Despite the assessee's representative filing a reply with details, the ITO re-assessed the Rs. 7,500 as income from undisclosed sources, as the evidence provided was deemed unsatisfactory. The CIT (Appeals) upheld this decision, stating that the onus to prove the agricultural income was on the assessee. The CIT (Appeals) found discrepancies in the agricultural income shown, including insufficient expenses for seed and fertilizers, and lack of evidence of land revenue payments or compensation to other parties involved.

During the appeal before the Tribunal, the assessee's counsel argued that evidence had been submitted to support the agricultural income, and past acceptance of similar income by the department in subsequent years should be considered. The Departmental Representative, however, supported the assessment of income from undisclosed sources, emphasizing the merits of the CIT (Appeals) order.

After considering the submissions and evidence, the Tribunal found that the assessee had provided evidence of ownership and possession of agricultural lands, as well as the derivation of income from those lands. The Tribunal noted that necessary investigations directed by the Tribunal were not adequately carried out by the ITO. Based on the existing record and findings of the ld. AAC in a previous order, the Tribunal concluded that the agricultural income shown by the assessee should be accepted, and the assessment of a portion as income from undisclosed sources was unwarranted. Therefore, the appeal was allowed, overturning the assessment of income from undisclosed sources.