9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Taxability of sales-tax subsidy received by the assessee for the assessment year 1981-82. Analysis: The appeal before the Appellate Tribunal ITAT CALCUTTA-C was regarding the taxability of a sales-tax subsidy received by the assessee for the assessment year 1981-82. The CIT(A) had deleted the sum from the assessee's income, stating that the subsidy did not accrue or arise during the relevant accounting year and was of capital nature, hence not taxable under section 41(1) of the IT Act. The department appealed against this decision. The department contended that the subsidy had accrued during the relevant accounting year and was linked to sales-tax paid by the assessee, making it taxable under section 41(1). The authorized representative of the assessee argued that the subsidy was not taxable in the relevant accounting year as the right to receive it was still pending due to ongoing legal proceedings. The Tribunal had to decide on the taxability of the subsidy and other related issues. The Tribunal analyzed the facts and legal arguments presented by both parties. It noted that the subsidy was received by the assessee based on an interim order dated 22-7-1980, but the legal right to receive it was not conclusively determined until a subsequent order on 12-5-1981. The Tribunal referred to the Supreme Court's decision in Hindustan Housing & Land Development Trust Ltd., emphasizing that income accrues only when it is finally determined, not merely based on a claim or interim order. Citing other relevant case laws, the Tribunal highlighted that income accrues when it becomes legally recoverable, irrespective of actual receipt, and that accrued income is what the assessee has a legal right to receive. Based on these legal principles, the Tribunal concluded that since the Government had filed an appeal against the judgment related to the subsidy, and the matter was still pending, the amount of the subsidy could not be taxed in the assessment year 1981-82. Therefore, the Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision on this point. The Tribunal did not delve into the other issues raised, such as the nature of the receipt and taxability under section 41(1), as those would be addressed in a regular assessment in the appropriate year. Ultimately, the department's appeal was dismissed, and the decision favored the assessee.
|
