1980 (4) TMI 149 - AT - Income Tax

Summary

Issues Involved:
1. Applicability of Section 104 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
2. Determination of whether the assessee is a company in which the public are substantially interested.
3. Calculation of the total number of shares issued and subscribed.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Applicability of Section 104 of the Income Tax Act, 1961:

The Income Tax Officer (ITO) initiated proceedings under Section 104 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the assessee company for failing to distribute any dividend within the prescribed 12 months. The ITO proposed the levy of additional tax, which was upheld by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner (AAC). The assessee contended that Section 104 was not applicable, asserting it was a company in which the public were substantially interested. However, the ITO and AAC concluded otherwise, leading to the levy of additional income tax.

2. Determination of whether the assessee is a company in which the public are substantially interested:

The ITO held that the assessee was not a company in which the public were substantially interested, based on the shareholding pattern. The ITO found that more than 50% of the shares were held by persons who were not members of the public, including a closely held company and directors and their relatives. The AAC upheld this view, relying on the definition in Section 2(18) of the Act and relevant case law. The Tribunal also upheld this finding, noting that shares held by the German concern, M/s. Magnet Fabric Bon, were not held beneficially and unconditionally throughout the relevant years, as the concern had expressed its intention to sell back the shares to the assessee company.

3. Calculation of the total number of shares issued and subscribed:

The ITO calculated the total number of shares issued and subscribed as 26,700, excluding 1,700 shares initially allotted to the German concern, M/s. Magnet Fabric Bon, due to the non-materialization of a technical know-how agreement. The assessee argued that the total number should be 28,400, including the 1,700 shares. The Tribunal found that the shares were not beneficially held by the German concern during the relevant years, supporting the ITO's calculation. The Tribunal concluded that the shares were under the control of the company's directors, affirming that the assessee company was not one in which the public were substantially interested.

Conclusion:

The Tribunal upheld the orders of the lower authorities for both assessment years, confirming the applicability of Section 104 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and the calculation of the total number of shares issued and subscribed. The appeals by the assessee were dismissed.