Home
Issues:
1. Deduction of expenses for electricity and chowkidar's salary in computing income from house property. 2. Levying of interest under sections 139(8) and 217(1A) of the IT Act. Analysis: 1. The first issue involves the deduction of expenses for electricity and chowkidar's salary in computing income from house property. The ITAT considered the rejection of these claims by the ITO, which were later allowed by the AAC. The ITAT accepted the Departmental ground that the chowkidar's salary cannot be separately allowed as a deduction. Regarding electricity charges, the matter was remanded back to the ITO for verification if these charges were part of the rent received. The decision was influenced by a similar matter in a previous case, leading to the acceptance of the Departmental ground partially. 2. The second issue pertains to the interest levied on the assessee under sections 139(8) and 217(1A) of the IT Act. The ITO did not pass a specific order but calculated the interest at the end of the assessment order. The AAC held that charging interest without informing the assessee and providing an opportunity to show cause would be contrary to law. The AAC deleted both levies, which was challenged by the Revenue. The ITAT deliberated on the appeal jurisdiction of the AAC against the levy of interest. After considering various authorities, the ITAT concluded that the appeal to the AAC over this matter was competent. The ITAT directed the ITO to pass a fresh order considering the provisions of IT Rules before levying or waiving the interest. In conclusion, the ITAT disposed of the Departmental appeals concerning the deduction of expenses for electricity and chowkidar's salary in computing income from house property. Additionally, the ITAT addressed the levying of interest under sections 139(8) and 217(1A) of the IT Act, emphasizing the need for proper application of discretion by the ITO before charging interest. The ITAT deemed both appeals to have been allowed for statistical purposes.
|