9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
1. Disallowance of interest on deposits made by family members. 2. Exigibility of dharmada collections. 3. Separate assessments for different periods due to a change in firm's constitution. 4. Disallowance of kitchen expenses. Analysis: Issue 1: Disallowance of Interest The appeals involved the disallowance of interest paid on deposits made by family members of the firm. The ITO disallowed the interest on the basis that the gifts were cross gifts and that one of the recipients was the wife of a partner. The AAC upheld the disallowance without issuing a show-cause notice. However, the ITAT held that the gifts were not cross gifts and were made out of love and affection, following the judgment in the case of CIT vs. Daljit Singh. The gifts were deemed reasonable, and the disallowance of interest for both years was reversed. Issue 2: Exigibility of Dharmada Collections For the assessment year 1975-76, the ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the amount representing dharmada collections, citing the judgment in the case of Bijli Cotton Mills. The issue was decided in favor of the assessee. Issue 3: Separate Assessments Regarding the assessment year 1976-77, the question arose whether two separate assessments were required due to a change in the firm's constitution. The ITAT referred to the Full Bench judgment in the case of Nand Lal Sohan Lal and concluded that only one assessment was necessary as the business continued with new partners alongside existing ones. Issue 4: Disallowance of Kitchen Expenses The disallowance of kitchen expenses was sustained by the ITAT as upheld by the AAC. The ITAT did not delve into other contentions raised by the assessee since the gifts were deemed valid and not excessive. In conclusion, ITA No. 930 of 1976-77 was allowed, and ITA No. 754 of 1977-78 was partly allowed by the ITAT, with decisions made in favor of the assessee on various grounds, including the disallowance of interest and the exigibility of certain collections.
|
