9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
1. Entitlement to interest under section 214 on excess payment of advance tax. 2. Applicability of amended provisions of section 214(1A) in relation to the assessment year. 3. Consideration of interest levy or grant as a substantive provision. 4. Rectification of assessment under section 154 and its relation to the amended provisions of section 214(1A). Detailed Analysis: 1. The primary issue in this case was the entitlement of the assessee to interest under section 214 on the excess payment of advance tax. The Assessing Officer initially did not grant interest under section 214 on the excess payment of advance tax, leading to a dispute. The first appellate authority, relying on a decision of the jurisdictional High Court, held that since the tax determined on regular assessment exceeded the advance tax paid, there was no requirement to pay interest under section 214. The assessee contended that the rectification order merged with the regular assessment, and therefore, interest should be granted. The Tribunal analyzed the provisions and held that the assessee was entitled to interest under section 214, ultimately allowing the appeal. 2. The second issue revolved around the applicability of the amended provisions of section 214(1A) in relation to the assessment year in question. The assessee argued that the first assessment order was passed when the amended section was in force, and thus, the law as it stood at the time of the original assessment order should apply. The departmental representative, however, relied on a Full Bench decision of the jurisdictional High Court to argue that the amendment to section 214(1A) was applicable only from the assessment year 1985-86 onwards. The Tribunal upheld the contention of the assessee, emphasizing that the amended provisions should apply to the case as the assessment was completed after the amended provision came into force. 3. The Tribunal also delved into the aspect of whether the levy of interest or granting of interest should be considered a substantive provision. It was held that the provisions applicable to the concerned assessment year would regulate the assessment procedure until the assessment was completed and the tax determined. As the levy or grant of interest could only arise after the completion of the assessment, it was not considered a substantive provision. Therefore, the law as it stood at the time of the completion of the assessment should govern the levy or grant of interest. 4. Lastly, the Tribunal addressed the issue of rectification of assessment under section 154 and its relation to the amended provisions of section 214(1A). It was noted that the Assessing Officer had failed to consider the enhanced value of closing stock during the assessment, which was rectified under section 154. The Tribunal held that the rectification must relate back to the date of the assessment, and the amended provisions of section 214(1A) should apply to the date of the assessment order. Consequently, the appeal of the assessee was allowed based on this analysis.
|
