9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Justification of the direction of the DC (Appeals) to the Assessing Officer not to charge interest under sections 139(8) and 217 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Detailed Analysis: 1. The appeal and cross objection were against the order of the Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) regarding the justification of not charging interest under sections 139(8) and 217 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. 2. The Assessing Officer initiated proceedings under section 147(a) as the assessee did not file a return for the year under consideration. The DC (Appeals) directed the Assessing Officer not to charge interest based on the argument that the assessment under section 147 was not a "regular assessment." 3. The Revenue contended that the amended provisions of Explanation 2 to section 139(8) and section 215(6) justified charging interest in the case, as they were clarificatory and applicable to pending cases. 4. The assessee argued that the term "regular assessment" was not modified by the amendments, and retrospective application was disputed. 5. The Tribunal held that interest under sections 139(8) and 217 was chargeable based on the amended provisions, which considered an assessment under section 147 as a "regular assessment" for the purpose of charging interest. 6. The Tribunal dismissed the argument that the amended provisions should be effective only for later assessment years, emphasizing the equitable interpretation of the law. 7. As the return was filed after the amendments were in force, the Tribunal held that interest was chargeable under sections 139(8) and 217 for the year under consideration. 8. Previous court decisions were distinguished as they were made before the amendments, and the Tribunal's decision in the assessee's earlier case did not apply due to the different factual circumstances. 9. The Tribunal concluded that interest under sections 139(8) and 217 was chargeable in the instant case based on the amended provisions of the Income-tax Act. 10. The Revenue's appeal was allowed, and the assessee's cross objection was dismissed.
|
