9911796707
|
Home
Issues involved: Interpretation of penalty provision u/s 273(b) of the Income-tax Act in relation to the initiation of penalty proceedings during regular assessment.
Summary: The High Court of Orissa was called upon to decide whether the Tribunal was justified in deleting the penalty levied u/s 273(b) of the Income-tax Act, as the penalty proceedings were not initiated during the course of regular assessment. The assessee, a forest contractor, failed to file returns for the relevant assessment years, leading to penalty proceedings initiated by the Income-tax Officer (ITO) under s. 273(b) of the Act. The penalties were later vacated by the Appellate Authority, stating that since the penalty proceedings were not part of regular assessment proceedings, they were cancelled. The Tribunal upheld the decision, relying on precedents from the Kerala and Patna High Courts. The main contention revolved around the definition of "regular assessment" as per s. 2(40) of the Act, which includes assessments u/s 143 or 144. The Court analyzed the provisions of the Act, including the deeming provision in s. 148 and the distinction in appeals under s. 246 for assessments u/s 143, 144, and 147. The Court emphasized that "regular assessment" does not encompass assessments u/s 147, as indicated by the statutory definition. The Court rejected the revenue's argument and agreed with the Tribunal's decision, citing the importance of harmonious construction of statutory provisions. It referenced decisions from various High Courts, including Kerala, Patna, and Punjab & Haryana, to support the conclusion that penalty under s. 273 cannot be invoked for assessments u/s 147. Consequently, the Court held in favor of the assessee, stating that the penalty was rightly deleted as the proceedings were not initiated during regular assessment. In conclusion, the Court ruled in favor of the assessee, directing the revenue to bear the costs and assessing a consolidated hearing fee. Judge N. K. Das concurred with the judgment.
|
