Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 1977 (3) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1977 (3) TMI 53 - AT - Income Tax

Issues:
- Reduction of assessment for assessment years 1973-74 and 1974-75 by the Assistant Commissioner, Agrl. Income Tax, Jaypore.
- Dispute over ownership of lands gifted to wife and son.
- Estimation of agricultural income.

Analysis:
The appeals were filed against the orders of the Assistant Commissioner reducing the assessment for the years 1973-74 and 1974-75. The revenue claimed the assessee owned various types of lands and did not maintain proper agricultural accounts, leading to assessments based on best judgment. The tax amounts assessed were challenged by the assessee, leading to further reduction by the Assistant Commissioner.

Regarding the ownership dispute, the assessee gifted lands to his wife and son, which were contested in the appeal. The Tribunal acknowledged the family custom of gifting land to the wife as Sindur Tika and the partition decree allotting lands to the son. It was held that the lands gifted to the wife and son should not be clubbed with the assessee's lands for tax assessment purposes. The lands gifted were to be taxed separately, and the son's lands were to be assessed separately if required by law.

The estimation of agricultural income was also a point of contention. The Assistant Commissioner's estimation was deemed reasonable by the Tribunal, and it was upheld against the assessee's challenge. However, the Tribunal emphasized the need to determine the actual lands in possession of the assessee for accurate tax assessment. Therefore, the case was remanded to the assessing officer for further inquiry and reassessment based on the Tribunal's observations.

In conclusion, the appeals were partially allowed, and the cases were remanded for further investigation and possible reassessment. Any excess tax collected was to be refunded accordingly.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates