Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 1999 (11) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1999 (11) TMI 107 - AT - Income Tax

Issues:
1. Upholding of capital gain findings by CIT(A)
2. Determination of long-term capital gains arising from property sale
3. Disallowance of certain expenses by CIT(A)

Issue 1: The appeal challenged the CIT(A)'s decision upholding the findings of the Asstt. CIT regarding the assessee earning a capital gain of Rs. 3,43,113. The appellant argued that this decision was based on a lack of understanding of the factual and legal aspects, rendering it unjust and legally unsustainable. The appellant further contended that the CIT(A) failed to consider the evidence and explanations provided, basing the decision on speculation and assumptions.

Issue 2: The Tribunal examined the case of the assessee involving the sale of a property to M/s Godfrey Phillips India Ltd. The AO determined a long-term capital gain of Rs. 3,43,113 after considering the sale agreement details and the cessation of rent payments by the buyer. The AO applied s. 2(47)(b) of the IT Act, which includes transactions where possession of immovable property is allowed in part-performance of a contract. The appellant argued that ownership transfer was subject to DDA consent and IT Department clearance, which were pending, citing legal precedents to support the position.

Issue 3: Regarding the disallowance of expenses, the Tribunal addressed specific items: Rs. 6,000 for telephone expenses, Rs. 3,200 for valuer fees, and Rs. 2,000 for miscellaneous expenses. The Tribunal directed the deletion of the Rs. 6,000 disallowance for telephone expenses, citing a Gujarat High Court decision. The fee paid to the valuer was considered a revenue expenditure based on a Calcutta High Court ruling, leading to its deletion. The miscellaneous expenses were deemed reasonable, with no prior or subsequent additions in other years, resulting in the deletion of this addition as well.

In conclusion, the Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, overturning the disallowance of certain expenses while upholding the determination of long-term capital gains from the property sale based on the legal interpretation of ownership transfer and relevant statutory provisions.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates