Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 1980 (8) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1980 (8) TMI 112 - AT - Income Tax

Issues:
1. Disallowance of general expenses by the ITO and AAC.
2. Disallowance of advertisement expenses by the ITO.
3. Addition of cash credit in the name of a creditor.
4. Levy of interest under section 216 of the IT Act.

Analysis:
1. The first issue revolves around the disallowance of Rs. 15,000 out of general expenses claimed by the assessee. The ITO disallowed the amount due to lack of confirmation from sub-agents who allegedly incurred the expenses on behalf of the assessee. The AAC upheld this disallowance as the nature of expenditure and confirmation from recipients were not provided. The ITAT, in absence of fresh material, upheld the disallowance.

2. The second issue concerns the disallowance of Rs. 3,500 out of advertisement expenses by the ITO. The disallowed amount represented expenses on gift-coupons and other items, with no details of parties receiving the payments. The ITAT upheld this disallowance due to lack of evidence regarding the recipients of the payments.

3. The third issue involves the addition of Rs. 5,000 as cash credit in the name of a creditor. The ITO added this amount as the assessee failed to establish the identity and genuineness of the cash credit. The AAC upheld the addition, citing restrictions under Rule 46A of the Income Tax Rules. The ITAT allowed fresh evidence submission and directed the ITO to verify the genuineness of the transaction.

4. The final issue pertains to the levy of interest under section 216 of the IT Act. The CIT(A) upheld the interest levy, but the ITAT found that interest was wrongly charged under section 216 as no estimate of advance tax was filed. The ITAT concluded that since no interest was chargeable under section 216, the interest demanded was deleted.

In conclusion, the ITAT partially allowed one appeal for statistical purposes and fully allowed the other appeal. The judgment highlights the importance of providing necessary documentation and evidence to support expenses and credits claimed, as well as the correct application of relevant sections of the IT Act to avoid unwarranted disallowances and levies.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates