Home
Issues:
Rejection of application for accumulation of income under s. 11(2) of the IT Act, 1961. Analysis: The appeal was against the rejection of the application of the assessee for accumulation of income under s. 11(2) of the IT Act, 1961. The assessee filed Form No. 10 along with the extract of resolution stating the object of accumulation of fund. However, the AO did not consider it proper and valid. The CIT(A) also did not favor the assessee's claim. The Tribunal observed that the assessee had fulfilled the requisite conditions by filing Form No. 10 intimating the object of accumulation, which should not have been denied. The Revenue authorities contended that the minutes of the meeting of the board of directors were manufactured and not reliable. They pointed out discrepancies between the extract filed with Form No. 10 and the complete minutes regarding the specific object of accumulation of funds. The Departmental Representative relied on judgments emphasizing the examination of the genuineness of documents by the Tribunal. The Tribunal found that the assessee had filed Form No. 10 specifying the object of accumulation of funds and later submitted complete minutes of the board meeting with specific objects of accumulation. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue's contention regarding the genuineness of the minutes, stating that the preparation and signing of minutes after the meeting were common practice. The Tribunal referred to judicial pronouncements to support the assessee's compliance with the law and concluded that the claim should not be rejected based on mere suspicion. In conclusion, the Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, setting aside the CIT(A)'s order and directing the AO to allow the claim for accumulation of income under s. 11(2) of the IT Act, 1961. The addition made on this count was deleted, ruling in favor of the assessee.
|