Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 1984 (7) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1984 (7) TMI 139 - AT - Income Tax

Issues:
1. Set off of losses brought forward from earlier years.
2. Failure of the ITO to determine the loss for the assessment year 1975-76.
3. Interpretation of provisions of section 80 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
4. Compliance with the directions of the AAC by the ITO.
5. Application of limitation period in setting off losses.

Analysis:
The judgment revolves around the issue of the set off of losses brought forward from earlier years by the assessee, a private limited company. Initially, the ITO set off losses for certain assessment years, resulting in a net taxable income of Rs. 3,758. However, the assessee also claimed the set off of loss for the assessment year 1975-76. The ITO's order lacked discussion on this claim, prompting the assessee to appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) to address the unconsidered loss. The AAC directed the ITO to determine the assessable net loss for the assessment year 1975-76, emphasizing the need to evaluate individual expenses like managing director's remuneration and advertisement expenses.

Despite the AAC's order, the ITO failed to determine the loss as directed. The Commissioner (Appeals) acknowledged the ITO's non-compliance with the prescribed time limit under section 153(2A) of the Act, causing hardship to the assessee. However, the Commissioner (Appeals) held that the uncomputed loss could not be carried forward and set off under section 72 of the Act, citing section 80's provisions. The assessee contended that timely filing of the return entitled them to the set off, emphasizing that the benefit under section 72(1) could not be denied due to the department's inaction.

In the final analysis, the Tribunal found the revenue's position indefensible, highlighting the forgotten AAC order and the subsequent time bar issue. The Tribunal emphasized that the loss must be determined as per AAC's directions, rejecting the department's time bar plea. Quoting legal principles, the Tribunal directed the ITO to determine the loss for the assessment year 1975-76 and carry it forward for set off against the current year's profit, in line with legal provisions. The judgment referenced relevant case laws and stressed the assessee's absolute right to carry forward losses, irrespective of the ITO's failure to determine them within the specified time frame. The appeal was allowed, and the lower authorities' orders were set aside, with directions for the ITO to comply with the legal requirements for setting off the losses.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates