9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
1. Validity of assessment proceedings under section 147(a) of the IT Act, 1961 and issuance of notice under section 148. 2. Requirement of recording reasons for initiation of proceedings under section 147(a). 3. Approval of the Commissioner for proceedings under section 147(a) and the necessity of accurate information in the proforma. 4. Legal implications of obtaining approval based on misrepresentation. 5. Assessment validity and cancellation due to unlawful proceedings. Detailed Analysis: The appeal before the Appellate Tribunal ITAT DELHI-E concerned the validity of assessment proceedings under section 147(a) of the IT Act, 1961, and the issuance of notice under section 148 for the assessment year 1973-74. The assessee contended that the assessment proceedings were ab initio void. The Tribunal acknowledged the importance of this preliminary ground as it goes to the root of the proceedings, leading them to address this issue first before considering other grounds raised by the assessee. The Tribunal examined the factual background of the case, highlighting that for the assessment year 1972-73, the assessee had filed a return and been assessed, while for the subsequent year 1973-74, an assessment had also been completed. However, the initiation of proceedings under section 147(a) for the latter year raised concerns regarding the validity of the process, particularly the recording of reasons for such initiation. The Tribunal emphasized the legal requirement for the assessing authority to record reasons in writing before issuing a notice under section 148. It noted that the approval of the Commissioner for such proceedings was essential, as demonstrated by the submission of a proposal in February 1982. However, the proforma used to obtain approval contained inaccurate information, failing to reflect the actual assessment history of the assessee for the relevant years. This discrepancy was deemed a violation of legal principles established by previous court judgments. Citing precedents from the Calcutta High Court and the Orissa High Court, the Tribunal emphasized the obligation of the assessing authority to provide accurate and complete information to the Commissioner for obtaining approval. It concluded that the defective proforma and the lack of proper application of mind by the assessing authority rendered the entire proceedings ab initio void and illegal. Consequently, the Tribunal ruled to cancel the assessment due to its unlawful foundation. Given the finding of the proceedings' unlawfulness, the Tribunal decided not to delve into the merits of other grounds raised by the assessee, as the foundational issue of validity had already been addressed comprehensively.
|
