9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
1. Withdrawal of interest granted under section 214 by an order of rectification under section 154 of the IT Act, 1961. Analysis: The appeal before the Appellate Tribunal ITAT GAUHATI was against the order of the Income Tax Officer (ITO) withdrawing the interest granted under section 214 by a rectification order under section 154 of the IT Act, 1961. The ITO had initially granted interest under section 214 to the assessee, a registered firm, after finding that a certain amount was refundable based on the taxes paid. However, the ITO later withdrew the interest as he deemed the amount paid on a specific date not to be advance-tax according to the provisions of the Act. The Appellate Tribunal had to determine whether the withdrawal of interest was justified under the law. The assessee contended that the view that interest under section 214 was allowable only on advance-tax strictly complying with certain provisions was debatable. The assessee argued that even amounts paid within the previous year were considered for various purposes, including interest calculations under section 215 or penalties under section 273. It was asserted that what qualifies as advance-tax for one purpose should not be disregarded for section 214 alone, presenting a debatable legal point that should not be rectified as a mistake. On the other hand, the Revenue argued that the interest was granted under section 214 due to a mistake of fact, specifically, the ITO's oversight that the amount in question did not meet the criteria for advance-tax under the relevant sections. The Revenue contended that the rectification order was valid as it corrected a factual error rather than a legal mistake. After considering the arguments from both sides, the Appellate Tribunal concluded that the assessee was entitled to succeed. The Tribunal noted that the crucial issue revolved around whether the amount paid on a specific date could be considered advance-tax as per the Act. The Tribunal highlighted that even if the amount did not strictly qualify as advance-tax, it should still be credited against outstanding taxes, as held in a previous judgment by the Gujarat High Court. The Tribunal emphasized that the interpretation of the relevant sections allowed for a liberal view in crediting amounts paid within the financial year for interest calculations under section 214. Ultimately, the Tribunal held that the alleged mistake by the ITO in granting interest on non-qualifying amounts was not a mistake apparent from the record, and therefore, the rectification order was canceled, and the appeal was allowed.
|
