9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Claim of no taxable gift when converting proprietary business into a partnership. Analysis: The appeal and cross-objection revolve around the assertion by the assessee that there was no taxable gift involved when the proprietary business was transformed into a partnership. The assessee, an individual conducting business under the name M/s Sarala Stores, converted the proprietary business into a partnership by introducing his major son and granting a 75% share in the firm. The Gift Tax Officer (GTO) treated this transfer as a taxable gift and made an ex-parte assessment, valuing the taxable gift at Rs. 41,065 based on various calculations. The assessee contended that the business had no goodwill and that the transfer was exempt under a specific section of the Gift-tax Act. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner (AAC) reduced the taxable gift to 25% of the goodwill calculated by the GTO, considering the managerial capacity of the son. The assessee appealed, arguing that no taxable gift existed due to the absence of goodwill and reiterated the exemption under the Act. The Revenue filed a cross-objection, claiming that the transfer of 75% of the goodwill constituted a gift. Upon careful consideration, the Tribunal opined in favor of the assessee. Referring to a Supreme Court decision, the Tribunal highlighted that no gift-tax was payable on the goodwill of the business alone. The Tribunal emphasized that for the exemption under the Act to apply, there must be a direct connection between the gift and the business's operation. In this case, the partnership deed and circumstances surrounding the conversion indicated a genuine business-related purpose. The deed outlined the reasons for the partnership, including the assessee's health issues and the need for additional management capacity. The Tribunal noted that the son contributed both capital and managerial expertise, demonstrating a commercial rationale for the partnership. Given these factors, the Tribunal concluded that the conversion was not a gift and, if deemed so, would be exempt under the relevant section of the Act. Additionally, the Tribunal emphasized that since the business's goodwill was contingent on factors like the Indian Oil agency, which could be terminated, valuing goodwill alone for gift-tax purposes was unjustified, as per the Supreme Court's precedent. Consequently, the assessment was deemed untenable and canceled. In conclusion, the Tribunal allowed the appeal by the assessee and dismissed the cross-objection by the Revenue, affirming that no taxable gift arose from the conversion of the proprietary business into a partnership.
|
