9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
1. Taxation of capital gains on sale of right shares. 2. Application of the rule in the case of Miss Dhun Dadabhoy Kapadia. 3. Treatment of bonus shares and right shares for cost calculation. 4. Principle of averaging for determining the cost of shares. 5. Remittance of the matter back to the ITO for reevaluation. Analysis: The appeal involved the taxation of capital gains on the sale of right shares by the Trustees of a Trust. The dispute arose as the assessee claimed a capital loss based on the impact of the issue of right shares on the existing holding of shares. The Assessing Officer (ITO) calculated the difference between the sale value and the amount paid on the shares, resulting in a profit. The first appellate authority rejected the assessee's claim, emphasizing the difficulty in attributing the fall in price solely to the issue of right shares. The ITO also argued against allowing the claimed loss, asserting the negligible effect on price due to the right shares. The Tribunal examined various legal precedents regarding the treatment of bonus shares and right shares for cost calculation. It highlighted that each block of shares has a separate identity and discussed the principles established by different High Courts and the Supreme Court. The Tribunal acknowledged the error in treating right shares as a different category, emphasizing that the concession in price was due to the existing shareholding. The Tribunal also analyzed the application of the rule in the case of Miss Dhun Dadabhoy Kapadia, emphasizing the distinction between selling options and subscribing to shares. Ultimately, the Tribunal concluded that the principle of averaging should be applied to determine the cost of shares, considering the contributions made for bonus shares and right shares. It rejected the assessee's claim based on the Kapadia case, stating that the averaging principle should apply uniformly to all shares with similar dividend prospects. The Tribunal allowed partial relief to the assessee and remitted the matter back to the ITO for reevaluation based on the principles discussed in the judgment. In conclusion, the appeal was allowed in part, with the Tribunal providing detailed guidance on the application of the averaging principle for determining the cost of shares and emphasizing the importance of commercial practice in such assessments. The Tribunal's decision aimed to ensure a fair and consistent approach to calculating profits on the sale of shares, considering the specific circumstances of the case.
|
