Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 1979 (6) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1979 (6) TMI 75 - AT - Income Tax

Issues:
1. Application of net profit rate on estimated charcoal sales.
2. Allowance of depreciation on a truck registered in another person's name.

Analysis:

Issue 1: Application of net profit rate on estimated charcoal sales
The assessee contested the net profit rate of 15% applied by the AAC on estimated charcoal sales for the assessment year 1975-76. The ITO had estimated sales based on lease money paid, applying a net profit rate of 15%, resulting in a net income of Rs. 38,700. The assessee argued that a lower net profit rate of 12.5% was applied in previous years and should be adopted for consistency. The ITAT agreed, reasoning that unless special circumstances justified a higher rate, consistency should prevail. Thus, the net profit rate was reduced to 12.5%, and relief was granted accordingly.

Issue 2: Allowance of depreciation on a truck registered in another person's name
The Department disputed the AAC's decision to allow depreciation on a truck registered in the name of a third party, contending that only the owner is entitled to depreciation under Section 32 of the IT Act. The assessee, however, argued that despite registration in another's name, he was the de facto owner, having arranged financing, recorded the cost in accounts, and declared income from the truck. Citing relevant case law, the ITAT upheld the AAC's decision, emphasizing that beneficial ownership is crucial for tax purposes. The Tribunal clarified that even in benami transactions, de facto ownership prevails, and as the assessee controlled and benefitted from the truck, he was entitled to depreciation. Consequently, the appeal by the assessee was partially allowed, while the Department's appeal was dismissed.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates