9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
1. Whether the assessee company was liable for wealth-tax in light of the amendment by Finance Act, 1988. 2. Valuation of each property for wealth-tax assessment. Analysis: Issue 1: The judgment dealt with the liability of the assessee company for wealth-tax following the amendment by Finance Act, 1988. The assessee contended that the amendment, excluding stock-in-trade from wealth-tax, should have retrospective effect from assessment year 1984-85. However, the tribunal rejected this argument, emphasizing that substantive law cannot apply retrospectively unless specifically provided for. The tribunal cited the distinction between substantive and procedural law, highlighting that the amendment was substantive in nature and effective from 1-4-1989 as per section 87 of the Finance Act, 1988. Therefore, the tribunal held that the assessee was liable for wealth-tax as per the amended provisions. Issue 2: Regarding the valuation of properties for wealth-tax assessment, the tribunal noted that the Assessing Officer had enhanced the values based on fair market values, with reference to the D.V.O. report for certain properties. The tribunal highlighted the change in valuation methodology post the amendment, where Schedule-III became mandatory for determining asset values. Despite the redundancy of referencing section 7(3) of the Wealth-tax Act in the Finance Act, the tribunal remanded the matter back to the CWT(A) to value the properties as per Schedule-III for all relevant years. The tribunal allowed some appeals partly and treated others as allowed for statistical purposes based on the valuation adjustments. In conclusion, the judgment clarified the liability of the assessee for wealth-tax post the amendment by Finance Act, 1988, and provided guidance on the valuation methodology for properties under the amended provisions, emphasizing the application of Schedule-III for determining asset values.
|
