9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved:
1. Claim of interest under Section 214. 2. Claim of interest under Section 244(1A). 3. Claim of interest under Section 243. Issue-wise Detailed Analysis: 1. Claim of Interest under Section 214: The assessee filed an application under Section 154 claiming interest on the refund due to excess payment of advance tax, which was not considered by the Income Tax Officer (ITO) or the Appellate Assistant Commissioner (AAC). The assessee argued that this was a clear case of refund due to excess advance tax payment, verifiable from records, and interest under Section 214 was payable. The department countered that there were divergent views on whether the claim constituted a mistake apparent from the record. Section 214 mandates that the Central Government shall pay simple interest at fifteen percent on advance tax paid if it exceeds the tax determined on regular assessment. The Tribunal noted that the ITO did not consider the interest element when issuing the refund, leading the assessee to file an application under Section 154. The Tribunal referred to the Delhi High Court decision in National Agricultural Co-operative Marketing Federation of India Ltd., which held that "regular assessment" includes revised assessments following appellate orders. The Tribunal concluded that the assessee was entitled to interest under Section 214, as the refund was due to the deletion of additions and disallowances in the appellate order. 2. Claim of Interest under Section 244(1A): The assessee claimed interest under Section 244(1A) for the period from 13-11-1979 to 12-10-1982, amounting to Rs. 1,598. The Tribunal referenced the Delhi High Court's interpretation that once taxes paid, including advance tax, are adjusted consequent to an assessment, they lose their separate character and are treated as tax paid under the assessment order. Thus, the assessee was entitled to interest under Section 244(1A) on the refund due from the date of the excess payment to the actual refund date. 3. Claim of Interest under Section 243: The assessee also claimed interest under Section 243 due to a delay in refund issuance by the ITO. Section 243 provides for interest if the ITO does not grant the refund within three months from the end of the month in which the total income is determined or the refund claim is made. The assessee argued a delay of ten months from the date of the orders. The Tribunal determined that the assessee was entitled to interest for seven months, as the Act allows interest if the refund is delayed beyond three months from the date of the order. Conclusion: The Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal in respect of interest under Sections 214 and 244(1A), and partly in respect of interest under Section 243, following the Delhi High Court decision and the Tribunal's decision in IAC vs. Garware Paints Ltd. The Tribunal noted that the Department's reliance on a previous Tribunal order did not apply, as that case involved different circumstances where the ITO had already granted some refund, and the rectification proceedings were not meant for re-thinking or re-applying the mind to the same set of facts. The appeal of the assessee was partly allowed.
|
