9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Appeals against the cancellation of penalties for failure to furnish wealth tax returns in time without reasonable cause for eight assessment years (1962-63 to 1969-70). Analysis: The judgment by the Appellate Tribunal ITAT MADRAS involved eight appeals challenging the cancellation of penalties imposed by the WTO for the late filing of wealth tax returns without reasonable cause. The Departmental Representative argued that the findings leading to the cancellation were contrary to facts and law. However, upon review of the case papers and hearing the arguments, the Tribunal upheld the impugned appellate order, concurring with the AAC's decision to cancel the penalties. In a crucial aspect of the case, it was revealed that the assessee had filed income tax returns in August 1970, and subsequently, the penalties for late filing of wealth tax returns were imposed by the ITO. The AAC, upon finding a reasonable cause for the delay, canceled all penalties for the eight years in question. The Department did not appeal against these cancellations, leading to a situation where arguing against a reasonable cause before August 1970 became challenging for the Departmental Representative. The Tribunal noted that the Department raised a significant ground regarding the delay in filing wealth tax returns after the income tax returns, emphasizing the need for discussion on this point. The Tribunal examined a letter dated August 7, 1970, where the assessee expressed intent to file wealth tax returns for the relevant years. This indicated the assessee's genuine efforts to comply with the tax requirements, starting well before the actual filing date in 1974. The Tribunal concluded that the assessee had been sincerely engaged in the process of filing wealth tax returns from August 1970 onwards, with ongoing discussions and assessments with tax authorities. Consequently, the Tribunal found no basis for penalty proceedings or imposition of penalties during the period between August 1970 and March 1974, citing the absence of contumacious conduct or circumstances warranting penalties as per legal precedents. Ultimately, the Tribunal dismissed all eight appeals, affirming the AAC's decision to cancel the penalties for late filing of wealth tax returns, based on the genuine efforts and circumstances presented by the assessee during the relevant period.
|
