9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
- Appeal against estate duty assessment and levy of interest - Applicability of High Court decision under IT Act to ED Act appeals - Exclusion of interest amount from estate duty payable - Justification for not levying interest Analysis: 1. The appeal was filed by the accountable person regarding the estate duty assessment following the demise of a person. The accountable person requested time for remitting the duty due to the nature of assets in the estate. The Assistant Controller allowed payment in instalments with interest. The accountable person started liquidating the demand and made payments as per the schedule provided. 2. The estate duty assessment determined the principal value of the estate, and the assessment order showed the estate duty payable. The accountable person appealed against the levy of interest, arguing that it should not have been charged as the provisional demand was paid before the due date for the first instalment. The Appellate Controller dismissed the appeal citing a decision of the Madras High Court under the IT Act. 3. The accountable person contended that the High Court decision under the IT Act should not apply to the present case under the ED Act due to differences in terminology. The appeal was considered valid under the ED Act, and the exclusion of interest from the estate duty payable was requested. 4. The Appellate Tribunal analyzed the provisions of the ED Act and found that the accountable person was entitled to appeal against the order determining the estate duty payable. The Tribunal held that the appeal should not have been dismissed in limine. Additionally, considering the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal found justification for not levying interest as the entire demand was liquidated before the due date, and the accountable person faced difficulties in immediate payment. 5. The Tribunal referred to the discretion of the Assistant Controller in fixing interest rates and highlighted that no minimum interest was prescribed. Considering the financial circumstances and the early liquidation of the demand, the Tribunal concluded that no interest should have been levied. The Tribunal directed the exclusion of the interest amount from the estate duty payable and ordered the refund of any excess duty paid. 6. Ultimately, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, emphasizing the accountable person's actions in liquidating the demand promptly and the financial implications of premature encashment of assets. The decision focused on the specific circumstances of the case and the provisions of the ED Act regarding payment of estate duty.
|
