9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
- Appeal by the Department against the order of the AAC allowing s. 35-B deduction for various expenses in an export business. - Deduction for commission paid to State Trading Corporation. - Deduction for commission paid to local agents of foreign buyers. - Deduction for interest payments to bankers. - Deduction for trade discount given to foreign buyers. Commission paid to State Trading Corporation: The Department objected that expenses were incurred within India, while s. 35-B allows deductions only for expenses outside India. However, the AAC allowed the deduction based on the nature of services provided by the State Trading Corporation, such as market development and technical information dissemination. The Corporation's activities were deemed to be eligible for weighted deduction under specific sub-clauses of s. 35-B. The Tribunal upheld the AAC's decision, emphasizing the Corporation's role in promoting the exporter's products in foreign markets. Commission paid to local agents of foreign buyers: The Department contended that since the commission was paid to local agents within India, weighted deduction was not allowable. However, the Tribunal ruled that the services provided by these agents, including market research, liaison with foreign buyers, and technical information sharing, qualified for weighted deduction under s. 35-B. The location of payment was deemed irrelevant, and the Tribunal emphasized the substantial duties performed by the local agents in promoting the exporter's goods in foreign markets. Interest payment to bankers: The Department objected to the deduction for interest payments, arguing that the expenses were incurred within India. The Tribunal referred to precedents from the Bombay Tribunal and the Madras Bench, which held that such interest payments were not eligible for weighted deduction. The Tribunal sided with the Department, disallowing the deduction for interest payments to bankers due to the nature of the services provided and the location of expenses. Trade discount: The Department challenged the deduction claimed for trade discounts given to foreign buyers, arguing that the discounts were not actual expenditures incurred by the assessee. The Tribunal noted discrepancies in the recording of discounts in the assessee's accounts but ultimately relied on the AAC's findings that the trade discounts were indeed paid to foreign buyers. The Tribunal upheld the Department's position, denying the weighted deduction for trade discounts under s. 35-B based on the contractual nature of trade discounts and the lack of actual expenditure by the assessee. In summary, the Tribunal upheld the deductions for commission paid to the State Trading Corporation and local agents of foreign buyers, but disallowed the deductions for interest payments to bankers and trade discounts given to foreign buyers based on the specific provisions and precedents related to s. 35-B of the Income Tax Act.
|
