1982 (4) TMI 188 - AT - Income Tax

Summary

Issues:
- Denial of interest under section 214 by the ITO
- Interpretation of provisions related to interest payable by the assessee under sections 214 and 217
- Comparison of base for calculating interest under sections 214 and 217
- Applicability of section 154 for rectification of alleged omission by the ITO

Analysis:

The appeal involved a dispute regarding the denial of interest under section 214 by the Income Tax Officer (ITO). The assessee, a registered firm, had filed an application under section 154 for interest on the tax deducted at source over the tax payable. The ITO allowed interest on the advance tax paid but not on the tax deducted at source. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner (AAC) upheld the ITO's decision, stating that interest under section 214 is authorized only on advance tax paid, not on tax deducted at source. The assessee argued that interest should be payable on the tax deducted at source as well, citing a judgment from the Gujarat High Court.

The main contention revolved around the interpretation of provisions related to interest payable by the assessee under sections 214 and 217. The assessee argued that if tax deducted at source is considered for calculating interest, the assessee should receive interest on it. The Departmental Representative argued that the bases for calculating interest under sections 214 and 217 are different, emphasizing that the reference to a "mirror image" in the Gujarat High Court judgment pertained to the starting date for interest calculation.

The Tribunal carefully examined the tax position and the relevant arguments. It was noted that interest under section 214 is payable on the excess of advance tax paid over the tax determined on regular assessment, while interest under section 217 is based on the assessed tax reduced by advance tax. The Tribunal concluded that the ITO cannot substitute the base prescribed under section 217 for calculating interest under section 214. The scheme of the Act aims to grant or charge interest on excess payment or under-payment of advance tax only, with different methods of computation for interest under sections 214 and 217.

Ultimately, the Tribunal found that the interest calculated by the ITO was in accordance with the law. The assessee's appeal was dismissed, and the alternative claim of the revenue that the argument of the assessee was debatable and could not be entertained under section 154 was accepted. The judgment reaffirmed the distinction in the bases for calculating interest under sections 214 and 217, emphasizing the statutory clarity and the lack of provision for interest on excess deduction of tax at source as in the case of advance tax.