1998 (9) TMI 144 - AT - Benami Property

Issues Involved:
1. Whether the unspent contribution of Rs. 14 lakh given by M/s. Carborandum Universal Ltd. should be excluded from the net wealth of the assessee.
2. Whether the assessee trust qualifies as a public charitable trust and is exempt under section 5(1)(i) of the Wealth-tax Act.
3. The retrospective effect of section 40A(11) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 on the liability of the assessee-trust to Wealth-tax.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Exclusion of Unspent Contribution from Net Wealth:
The assessee, an irrevocable trust set up by M/s. Carborandum Universal Ltd., claimed that the unspent contribution of Rs. 14 lakh should be excluded from its net wealth. The authorities below rejected this claim, stating that the liability to repay the amount did not exist on the relevant valuation dates as the company had not claimed repayment before those dates. The Tribunal considered whether the properties to which Carborandum Universal could make a claim under section 40A(11) could be regarded as belonging to the assessee-trust for Wealth-tax purposes from 1-4-1980 or only from the date the claim was made. It was concluded that the retrospective operation of section 40A(11) should be given full effect, meaning the trust ceased to be the owner of the fund from 1-4-1980, and thus, the unspent amount should not be included in the net wealth of the trust.

2. Public Charitable Trust Status:
The assessee contended that it is a public charitable trust and thus exempt under section 5(1)(i) of the Wealth-tax Act. However, the Tribunal noted that decisions in similar cases, such as CIT v. Andhra Pradesh Police Welfare Society and Sakthi Charities v. CIT, were against the assessee. It was concluded that the assessee could not succeed on this point, as the employees of a company could not be regarded as a section of the public to treat the trust as a public charitable trust.

3. Retrospective Effect of Section 40A(11):
The Tribunal examined the retrospective effect of section 40A(11) introduced by the Finance Act, 1984, with effect from 1-4-1980. This section allowed companies to claim repayment of unutilized contributions made to trusts. The Tribunal considered whether this retrospective provision affected the liability of the assessee-trust to Wealth-tax. It was concluded that the retrospective operation of section 40A(11) meant that the trust ceased to own the unutilized funds from 1-4-1980. Consequently, the unspent amount should not be included in the net wealth of the trust for Wealth-tax purposes from that date onwards.

Separate Judgments:

Judicial Member's View:
The Judicial Member concluded that the retrospective operation of section 40A(11) should be fully recognized, meaning the trust ceased to own the unspent funds from 1-4-1980. Thus, the unspent amount should be excluded from the net wealth of the trust.

Accountant Member's View:
The Accountant Member disagreed, arguing that the liability to repay the unspent amount arose only when the company made a claim, which was after the relevant valuation dates. Therefore, the unspent amount should be included in the net wealth of the trust until the claim was made.

Third Member's Decision:
The Third Member agreed with the Judicial Member, holding that the retrospective operation of section 40A(11) affected the liability of the assessee-trust to Wealth-tax. The unspent amount should be excluded from the net wealth of the trust from 1-4-1980.

Final Order:
In accordance with the majority opinion, the appeals of the assessee were allowed, and the unspent contribution of Rs. 14 lakh was excluded from the net wealth of the assessee.

← Previous Next →