9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
1. Whether the interest under s. 201(1A) was rightly charged. Analysis: The appeal pertains to the asst. yr. 1995-96, where the only effective ground remaining was whether the interest under s. 201(1A) was correctly charged. The assessee, engaged in the business of manufacturing and selling country liquor, filed the return declaring income along with audit reports. The trading results were accepted during scrutiny, and interest under s. 201(1A) was directed to be charged along with other interests upon processing under s. 143(3). The CIT(A) dismissed the appeal, leading to the appeal before the Tribunal. The counsel for the assessee contended that interest under s. 201(1A) cannot be part of the assessment order and should be separately appealable under s. 246(1)(i). It was argued that the sum payable under s. 143(3) should not include interest under s. 201(1A) as it is not dependent on income computation. The assessee did not fail to deduct or pay tax at source as required by the Act. The Tribunal examined the provisions of s. 201 and noted that a separate order appealable under s. 201(1A) is necessary, as s. 143(3) deals with assessing total income or loss, not failure to deduct or pay tax. Since the assessee did not deduct any tax at source, there was no liability to pay TDS under s. 201(1A). The Tribunal clarified that s. 201(1A) applies to cases of failure to deduct or pay after deduction, which was not applicable to the assessee in this scenario. Additionally, it was highlighted that s. 201(1A) does not apply to an assessee making collections at source under s. 206C. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)'s order levying interest under s. 201(1A), ultimately allowing the appeal of the assessee.
|
