Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2004 (8) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2004 (8) TMI 370 - AT - Income Tax


Issues Involved:
1. Eligibility for deduction u/s 80-IB(10) of the IT Act, 1961.
2. Commencement date of development and construction of the housing project.

Summary:

1. Eligibility for Deduction u/s 80-IB(10):
The assessee, engaged in house building construction, claimed a deduction of Rs. 4,40,049 u/s 80-IB(10) for its project 'Nirmiti Vihar'. The AO disallowed the deduction, stating that the project had commenced before the specified date of 1st Oct., 1998. The CIT(A) upheld this disallowance, noting that the development agreement, irrevocable power of attorney, and preliminary sanctions were obtained before 1st Oct., 1998. The CIT(A) concluded that the development had commenced prior to the specified date, making the assessee ineligible for the deduction.

2. Commencement Date of Development and Construction:
The assessee argued that the development and construction started after 1st Oct., 1998, and that preliminary activities such as obtaining permissions and converting agricultural land to non-agricultural land were preparatory steps. The Tribunal noted that the actual construction work began after the building permission was sanctioned on 23rd July, 1999. The Tribunal found that the expenses incurred before 1st Oct., 1998, were minimal and related to land cleaning and Pooja expenses, which did not constitute commencement of development and construction.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal concluded that the development and construction of the housing project commenced after 1st Oct., 1998, and the assessee fulfilled all other conditions for claiming the deduction u/s 80-IB(10). Therefore, the Tribunal reversed the findings of the CIT(A) and directed the AO to allow the deduction to the assessee.

Result:
The appeal was allowed.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates