Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 1967 (6) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1967 (6) TMI 19 - HC - Income Tax


Issues:
1. Disallowance of sum paid to financiers in lieu of interest.
2. Disallowance of a portion of cultivation and management expenses.

Analysis:
1. The first issue pertains to the disallowance of a sum paid to financiers in lieu of interest by the assessee. The assessee claimed a deduction of Rs. 13,797.55, which was disallowed by the revenue and the Tribunal. The court analyzed the nature of the transaction between the assessee and the financier, Mr. John. The agreement between them provided for payment of a share of net profits to Mr. John in lieu of interest. The court held that the transaction was essentially one of borrowing on interest, as evidenced by the agreement's terms. The court found that the payment made was revenue expenditure laid out for the purpose of earning profits, making it eligible for deduction under Section 5(e) of the Madras Agricultural Income-tax Act, 1955. The court concluded that the deduction claimed by the assessee should be allowed, ruling in favor of the assessee on this issue.

2. The second issue concerns the disallowance of Rs. 4,355 out of cultivation and management expenses claimed by the assessee. The court promptly addressed this issue, stating that the disallowance was based on the merits of the claim, and no significant legal question arose. The court ruled against the assessee on this issue, upholding the disallowance of the mentioned amount from the claimed expenses.

In conclusion, the court's judgment favored the assessee on the first issue regarding the deduction of the sum paid to financiers in lieu of interest, allowing the deduction under Section 5(e) of the Act. However, the court ruled against the assessee on the second issue of disallowance of a portion of cultivation and management expenses.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates