1988 (11) TMI 210 - Commissioner - Central Excise

Summary

Issues: Classification of products under Central Excise Tariff - Whether products are filing cabinets or safes.

In this case, the appeal was directed against an order passed by the Assistant Collector Central Excise Division E, Bombay, classifying certain products under a specific sub-heading. The appellant contended that the products should be classified as filing cabinets under a different sub-heading, relying on a previous order-in-appeal. The Assistant Collector classified the products under a sub-heading covering safes and strong boxes based on their construction and protective features against theft and fire.

Upon careful review, the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals) analyzed the relevant headings under the Central Excise Tariff. Heading 83.03 pertains to safes and strong boxes, while Heading 83.04 specifically covers filing cabinets and similar office equipment. The Collector noted that the impugned products did not meet the criteria to be classified as safes, as they did not have the structural characteristics or strength of safes as per industry standards.

The Collector emphasized that Heading 83.04 explicitly includes filing cabinets without any exclusion based on additional features like fire resistance or security locks. The presence of combination locks on the products did not alter their fundamental purpose as filing cabinets. Referring to a previous CEGAT decision, the Collector concluded that the impugned products should be classified under Heading 83.04 as filing cabinets, not under Heading 83.03 for safes.

Ultimately, the Collector set aside the Assistant Collector's order and allowed the appeal, directing the classification of the products as filing cabinets under Heading 83.04 of the Central Excise Tariff.