1989 (2) TMI 250 - AT - Central Excise

Summary

The appeal was against the Collector's order rejecting it for non-compliance with Section 35F. The appellants argued that no demand quantifying the duty amount was issued. The SDR also agreed that no such demand was issued. The Tribunal found that without a quantified demand, the appellants could not be expected to make the deposit. The Collector's order was set aside, and the case was remanded for consideration on merits.