Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + AT Customs - 1989 (8) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1989 (8) TMI 178 - AT - Customs

Issues:
1. Determination of imported goods as 'Woollen Waste' or otherwise.

Analysis:
The case involved the import of goods declared as 'Woollen Waste' by M/s. Kohinoor Woollen Mills seeking duty exemption under a specific notification. The goods were examined multiple times, with the Dy. Collector concluding that they consisted predominantly of cut silvers not arising during yarn manufacturing, leading to confiscation under the Customs Act. The Collector (Appeals) upheld this decision based on visual examination and lack of evidence refuting it.

The appellants appealed to the Tribunal, arguing that the Collector (Appeals) order was not detailed, the goods were not in bulk form, and examination reports showed a mixture of slivers and rovings. They referenced previous tribunal orders on woollen waste and the lack of analysis on specifications by the lower authorities. The appellants also highlighted the high price of the goods and their intended use for manufacturing superior quality worsted yarn and cloth.

During the Tribunal hearing, arguments were presented based on previous tribunal decisions and technical definitions of 'soft waste' in the textile industry. The Tribunal analyzed various certificates and definitions related to wool waste, emphasizing that the length and composition of the imported goods aligned with woollen waste characteristics. They referenced a previous tribunal decision upheld by the Supreme Court, concluding that the goods should be considered woollen waste eligible for duty exemption.

In the final judgment, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, noting that the goods should be considered woollen waste under the relevant notification. They criticized the lower authorities for focusing on the high price of the goods, which was not a basis for disallowing the appeal. The Tribunal directed the department to release the consignment, leaving it to their discretion if mutilation was necessary. Additionally, the Tribunal clarified that they had no power to issue a detention certificate, urging the urgent release of the goods due to their uncleared status in the docks.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates