9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2009 (1) TMI 397 - HC - Income TaxThe Director of Income-tax (Exemptions) recorded a finding that the assessee is not entitled to deduction under section 10(20) of the Act, as it does not fall in the category of local authority, hence, there was no reason for the assessee to prefer the registration under section 12A Tribunal directing AO to reconsider status of assessee Held that Tribunal had only remitted the matter to AO to to reconsider the matter afresh after affording an opportunity of hearing to both parties - The operative part of the order shows that the everything has been left open to be considered afresh by the Assessing Officer. That being so, we do not find that any substantial question of law arises to be considered by us.
Issues:
Appeal under section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal for the assessment year 2004-05. Interpretation of provisions of section 10(20) and section 12A of the Act regarding exemption and registration of the assessee. Judicial directions passed by the Tribunal for reconsideration by the Assessing Officer. Determination of substantial question of law for consideration by the High Court. Clarification on the right to challenge the final order before an appellate forum. Analysis: The High Court of Karnataka heard an appeal under section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, against the order of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal for the assessment year 2004-05. The respondent/assessee had appealed against the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) order, claiming exemption under section 10(20) of the Act and registration under section 12A. The Director of Income-tax (Exemptions) found the assessee not eligible for deduction under section 10(20) as it did not qualify as a local authority, questioning the need for registration under section 12A. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to reconsider the assessee's status, emphasizing adherence to the Constitution of India's provisions and judgments of various High Courts. The Tribunal's order did not mandate registration under section 12A but allowed the appeals for statistical purposes. The High Court observed that no substantial question of law arose for consideration as the Tribunal merely instructed the Assessing Officer to review the matter after hearing both parties. The court noted that the Tribunal did not specifically direct registration under section 12A, leaving the decision open for fresh consideration. Consequently, the High Court deemed no substantial legal question necessitated its intervention. However, the court clarified that either party could challenge the final order before an appropriate appellate forum as per the law, ensuring the right to appeal against the Assessing Officer's decision. In conclusion, the High Court disposed of the appeal, affirming the Tribunal's directions for reassessment by the Assessing Officer without requiring registration under section 12A. The court emphasized the parties' right to challenge the final order through the appropriate appellate channels, maintaining the legal recourse available to both sides in case of dissatisfaction with the Assessing Officer's decision.
|
