Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2009 (5) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2009 (5) TMI 280 - AT - Central Excise


Issues:
Admissibility of goods to capital goods credit in a factory manufacturing copper anode under Heading 74 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985.

Analysis:
The dispute in the appeals revolved around the admissibility of various goods to capital goods credit in the factory of the respondents, who are manufacturers of copper anode under Heading 74 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The goods in question included PLC Hardware, CCTV System, Radio Remote Control, Memory Modules, Camera Mount, Monitor Mount, Furosplit FN syrup, and Furosplit FN activator.

The Tribunal considered the nature and usage of each item to determine their eligibility for capital goods credit. It was established that PLC Hardware, CCTV System, Radio Remote Control, and Memory Modules were instrumental in the control system of the plant for monitoring manufacturing activities. These items were deemed to be components or accessories of the smelter plant falling under an eligible heading, thus qualifying for capital goods credit under Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules.

Regarding Camera Mount and Monitor Mount, it was found that they were essential for monitoring the smelter plant through an advanced control system. These mounts were considered as accessories of the smelter plant and were therefore eligible for credit.

Furthermore, the Tribunal analyzed Furosplit FN syrup and Furosplit FN activator, recognizing them as pasting materials used in the gas cleaning section of the sulphuric acid plant. These materials were deemed components of the sulphuric acid plant's machines and were held eligible for capital goods credit.

Consequently, the Tribunal upheld the extension of credit on all disputed items in the appeals, affirming the benefit of credit and rejecting the appeals. The cross-objections, being replies to the Revenue's appeals, were dismissed accordingly.

In conclusion, the judgment clarified the admissibility of various goods to capital goods credit in a manufacturing facility, emphasizing the importance of analyzing the nature and usage of each item to determine eligibility under the relevant provisions of the Central Excise Rules.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates