Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases GST GST + AAR GST - 2024 (6) TMI AAR This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2024 (6) TMI 104 - AAR - GST


Issues Involved:
1. Whether services provided by individual truck owners for transport of raw materials & finished goods including loading and unloading are liable for GST.
2. Whether the individual transporters are classified as Goods Transport Agency (GTA).
3. Whether the applicant is required to pay tax under Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM) on the transportation charges.

Summary:

Issue 1: Liability of GST on Services Provided by Individual Truck Owners
The applicant sought an advance ruling on whether the services provided by individual truck owners for the transport of raw materials and finished goods, including loading and unloading, are liable for GST. The applicant contended that since the transporters do not issue consignment notes, they do not qualify as a Goods Transport Agency (GTA) and thus are not liable for GST under RCM.

Issue 2: Classification of Individual Transporters as GTA
The applicant argued that individual truck owners do not issue consignment notes and therefore should not be classified as GTA. The definition of GTA u/s Notification 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28/06/2017 specifies that a GTA is any person who provides service in relation to the transport of goods by road and issues a consignment note. The applicant provided evidence that the transporters only carry the invoice, delivery challan, and e-way bill but do not issue consignment notes.

Issue 3: Requirement to Pay Tax Under RCM
The applicant referenced Notification 13/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28/06/2017, which lists services provided by a GTA to specified categories of persons as liable under RCM. The applicant falls under one of these specified categories but argued that since the transporters do not issue consignment notes, they are not GTAs, and thus, the applicant should not be liable to pay GST under RCM.

Findings & Discussion:
The Authority examined the contracts and invoices provided by the applicant and observed that the transporters are responsible for the safe delivery of goods, which implies a lien on the goods. The transporters issue documents containing details similar to a consignment note, such as the invoice, delivery challan, and e-way bill, which include necessary details like the name of the consignor and consignee, registration number of the goods carriage, and details of the goods transported.

Ruling:
The Authority concluded that the services provided by individual truck owners for the transport of raw materials and finished goods, including loading and unloading, are liable to GST. The transporters qualify as a Goods Transport Agency (GTA) as they issue documents containing details akin to a consignment note. Therefore, the applicant is required to discharge GST under the provisions of the CGST Act 2017 and the rules made thereunder, read with Notification 11/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 and Notification 13/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates