Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2009 (3) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2009 (3) TMI 369 - AT - Central Excise


The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, CHENNAI, consisting of Ms. Jyoti Balasundaram and Shri P. Karthikeyan, heard Cross Objection No. E/CO/9/2004, involving the classification of a product called 'latex bulbs' manufactured by M/s. Jain Rubber Pvt. Ltd. The original authority reclassified the product under Chapter Sub-Heading 4014.90, demanding differential duty. The Commissioner (Appeals) later upheld the classification as CSH 9018.00. The Revenue filed an appeal to restore the original authority's order, arguing that the goods were marketable and excisable under Chapter Sub-Heading 4014.90. The respondents contended that the latex bulb was not an article but a part of an IV set, classified under Chapter 9018. The Tribunal analyzed the issue and found that the latex bulb was appropriately classified under C.S.H. 4014.90, as it was a hygienic article of vulcanized rubber used in an IV set. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal by the Revenue was allowed. The Tribunal also dismissed the argument that the goods were not established to be marketable, as identical goods had been imported for sale. The decision was pronounced on 16-3-2009.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates