Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 2024 (9) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2024 (9) TMI 974 - HC - Income Tax


Issues:
1. Allegation of non-deduction of tax at source by the accused.
2. Interpretation of Section 276B of the Income Tax Act.
3. Necessity of prosecution under Section 276B.

Detailed Analysis:
The judgment by the High Court of Kerala involved the case of accused Nos. 1 to 4 in CC No.637/2014, where they were accused of not deducting tax at source as required by the Income Tax Act. The complaint was filed by the Income Tax Officer (TDS), alleging an offence under Section 276B of the Income Tax Act. The petitioners argued that even if the allegations were accepted, no offence was made out. The petitioners contended that during the financial year 2010-11, TDS was not deducted due to ignorance, but the entire amount along with penal interest was paid upon realization of the mistake (para. 2-4).

The court examined Section 276B of the Income Tax Act, which stipulates punishment for failure to pay tax deducted at source or tax payable to the Central Government. The section provides for imprisonment ranging from three months to seven years along with a fine for non-compliance. The court noted that the petitioners had paid the entire outstanding amount with penal interest upon being informed by the department (para. 4-5).

The court considered the argument put forth by the petitioners that Section 276B is intended for non-payment of already deducted TDS and since the amount was paid in full, the prosecution under this section was not warranted. The court agreed with this argument, stating that if the petitioners had rectified the mistake by paying the outstanding amount along with interest, the continuation of the prosecution was unnecessary. Consequently, the court allowed the Criminal Miscellaneous Case and quashed all further proceedings against the petitioners in CC No.637/2014 (para. 6).

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates