Home Case Index All Cases GST GST + HC GST - 2024 (11) TMI HC This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2024 (11) TMI 437 - HC - GSTMaintainability of petition - availability of statutory remedy of appeal under CGST/OGST Act due to non-constitution of Appellate Tribunal - HELD THAT - It is not at all in dispute that the order impugned in this writ petition, which has been passed by the Authority under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act)/Odisha Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (OGST Act) is appealable under Section 112 of the CGST/OGST Act, 2017. It is also not in dispute that because of non-constitution of the Appellate Tribunal as required under section 109 of the said Acts, the petitioner is deprived of his statutory remedy of Appeal and the corresponding benefit of subsections-8 9 of section 112 of the said Acts. Taking into account the Central Goods and Services Tax (Ninth Removal of Difficulties) Order, 2019 dated 03.12.2019 issued by the Government of India and subsequent clarification issued by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (GST Policy Wing) vide Circular No.132/2/2020 dated 18th March, 2020, it is deemed proper in the interest of justice to dispose of this writ petition. Petition disposed off.
Issues:
1. Constitution of Appellate Tribunal under CGST Act and OGST Act. 2. Availability of statutory remedy of Appeal. 3. Interpretation of Central Goods and Services Tax (Ninth Removal of Difficulties) Order, 2019. 4. Clarification by Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs regarding appeal process. 5. Granting of stay on recovery of balance tax amount. 6. Requirement for petitioner to file appeal once Tribunal is constituted. 7. Consequences of not availing the remedy of appeal. Analysis: The High Court dealt with a matter concerning the non-constitution of the Appellate Tribunal under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act) and Odisha Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (OGST Act). It was acknowledged that the petitioner was deprived of the statutory remedy of Appeal due to the absence of the Appellate Tribunal as required by law. The Government of India, based on the recommendation of the GST Council, issued the Central Goods and Services Tax (Ninth Removal of Difficulties) Order, 2019 to address this issue. The order clarified the timelines for filing appeals in the absence of the Appellate Tribunal, providing specific dates for initiating the appeal process. In line with the Removal of Difficulties Order, the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs issued a circular in March 2020, emphasizing the procedure for filing appeals considering the non-constitution of the Appellate Tribunal. The circular outlined that the time limit for filing appeals would commence from the date the President or State President of the Tribunal enters office. It further advised the appellate authorities to expedite the disposal of pending appeals without waiting for the Tribunal's constitution. The Court, considering the Orders and Circular, directed that the petitioner be granted a stay on the recovery of the balance tax amount, subject to certain conditions. It emphasized that the stay on deposit of the statutory amount should not be open-ended and required the petitioner to file an appeal under Section 112 of the CGST/OGST Act once the Tribunal is constituted and functional. Failure to file the appeal within the specified period upon the Tribunal's constitution would allow the respondent-Authorities to proceed with the matter as per the law. Ultimately, the Court disposed of the writ petition, providing specific directions for the petitioner to avail the statutory remedy of appeal once the Appellate Tribunal is established, while also allowing the respondent-Authorities to take further action if the petitioner chooses not to file the appeal within the specified timeline post-Tribunal constitution.
|