Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2024 (12) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2024 (12) TMI 1164 - AT - Income Tax


Issues Involved:

1. Restriction of addition under Section 69B of the Income-tax Act, 1961, concerning alleged undisclosed stock.
2. Disallowance of car running and maintenance expenditure and car depreciation.
3. Addition under Section 69A of the Income-tax Act related to unexplained cash credit.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Restriction of Addition under Section 69B:

The core issue revolves around the addition of Rs 91,08,879/- under Section 69B of the Income-tax Act, 1961, due to alleged undisclosed stock. A search operation under Section 132 was conducted, revealing discrepancies between the physical stock valued by the search party and the recorded closing stock. The search party valued the inventory at Rs 11,12,45,367/-, while the AO calculated the recorded value at Rs 5,67,92,915/-, leading to an addition of Rs 5,44,07,085/- for excess stock. The assessee contested this, arguing that the valuation was flawed as it used market rates instead of the lower of weighted average cost or market price. The CIT(A) recalculated the closing stock using the current year's gross profit rate of 28.10%, arriving at a revised closing stock of Rs 10,20,91,121/-, thus reducing the excess stock to Rs 91,08,879/-. However, the tribunal found that the correct closing stock should have been Rs 10,12,53,736/-, eliminating any deficit and leading to the deletion of the addition.

2. Disallowance of Car Running and Maintenance Expenditure and Car Depreciation:

The assessee claimed deductions for car depreciation and running expenses, which the AO partially disallowed, suspecting personal use by partners. The CIT(A) reduced this disallowance and allowed full depreciation, recognizing it as a statutory allowance. The tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, emphasizing that the books of accounts were not rejected and the partners had personal vehicles, negating the assumption of personal use of the firm's vehicles. Therefore, the tribunal deleted the ad hoc disallowance of Rs 2 lakhs for car maintenance expenses and upheld the allowance of car depreciation.

3. Addition under Section 69A:

The issue here pertains to the addition of Rs 29,56,800/- as unexplained cash credit under Section 69A, based on a seized document indicating unaccounted cash transactions. The assessee initially admitted to receiving cash from three parties but later contended that these were rough jottings related to demands for payments. The CIT(A) found that the entries represented unaccounted sales and estimated the gross profit on these sales at 28.10%, reducing the addition to Rs 8,30,861/-. The tribunal agreed with the CIT(A), noting that unaccounted sales imply unaccounted purchases, and only the profit element should be taxed. The tribunal found no infirmity in the CIT(A)'s application of the gross profit rate and dismissed the revenue's appeal on this ground.

In conclusion, the tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal regarding the addition under Section 69B and the disallowance of car expenses, while dismissing the revenue's appeal concerning the addition under Section 69A. The tribunal's decisions were based on a detailed examination of the facts, ensuring that only justified amounts were taxed.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates