1969 (3) TMI 19 - HC - Income Tax

Whether a voluntary gesture on the part of an assessee to waive interest, which was admittedly payable to him by a third party and which was assesseble under other sources , can be treated as an admissible expenditure

Summary

Issues:
Whether a voluntary gesture by an assessee to waive interest payable by a third party can be treated as an admissible expenditure.

Analysis:
The case involved the question of whether a voluntary gesture by the assessee to waive interest, which was due from a private limited company, could be considered as an admissible expenditure. The assessee, acting as the karta of an Hindu undivided family, had advanced amounts to a company owned by himself and his wife. The company's board passed a resolution to debit the directors' accounts for excess interest charged in previous years. The assessee implemented this resolution and deducted a sum from the interest due to him, claiming it as a business expense. However, the Income-tax Officer disallowed this deduction, which was upheld by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner and the Appellate Tribunal.

The court considered whether the waiver of interest by the assessee was valid for tax purposes. The Tribunal found no commercial expediency for the waiver and that the resolution passed by the company's board was self-serving. The court emphasized that the interest income was rightfully assessed under "other sources" and that the waiver, based on a resolution lacking legitimate grounds, could not be used by the assessee to claim a tax benefit. The court highlighted that the waiver did not serve the purpose of the assessee's business activity and lacked a lawful basis, making it an unsustainable claim.

Moreover, the court rejected the argument that the interest income should be treated as a trade debt and considered it as income from "other sources." The court emphasized that the waiver lacked commercial expediency, considering the company's constitution, the vague resolution, and the accrual basis of the accounting maintained by the assessee. The court cited a previous judgment to support the view that the income accrued to the assessee and could not be waived without legal basis. Ultimately, the court ruled against the assessee, stating that the waiver of interest income was not a valid deduction and upheld the department's decision with costs.