Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + AAR Customs - 2025 (3) TMI AAR This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2025 (3) TMI 393 - AAR - Customs


ISSUES PRESENTED and CONSIDERED

The primary issues considered in this legal judgment are:

a) The classification of the Small-Form Factor Pluggable (SFP) Transceiver under the Customs Tariff. Specifically, whether it falls under CTI 85176290 as other machines for the reception, conversion, and transmission or regeneration of voice, images, or other data, including switching and routing apparatus.

b) If the SFP Transceiver is classifiable under CTI 85176290, whether it is eligible for a concessional rate of duty under Serial No. 20 of Notification No. 57/2017-Cus., dated 30.06.2017.

ISSUE-WISE DETAILED ANALYSIS

Classification of SFP Transceiver under CTI 85176290

- Relevant Legal Framework and Precedents: The classification of goods under the Customs Tariff is guided by the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, and the Harmonized System of Nomenclature (HSN) Explanatory Notes. The key legal provision is the classification under Chapter 85, specifically heading 8517, which covers apparatus for the transmission or reception of voice, images, or other data.

- Court's Interpretation and Reasoning: The Court analyzed the function of SFP Transceivers, which are devices that receive, convert, and transmit signals. The judgment emphasized that these transceivers function independently once inserted into networking devices, performing specific tasks without external assistance.

- Key Evidence and Findings: The Court considered the applicant's submission that SFP Transceivers are pluggable modules used in various networking devices and can operate in different network types. The HSN Explanatory Notes categorize such devices under "other communication apparatus," supporting their classification under CTI 85176290.

- Application of Law to Facts: The Court applied the HSN Explanatory Notes and the Customs Tariff provisions, concluding that SFP Transceivers are not parts but independent machines. The classification under CTI 85176290 was supported by international rulings and the specific functional capabilities of the transceivers.

- Treatment of Competing Arguments: The Court addressed the conflicting Tribunal decisions classifying SFP Transceivers under CTI 85177090 as parts. It distinguished these cases by emphasizing the independent functionality of transceivers, which do not fit the definition of parts.

- Conclusions: The Court concluded that SFP Transceivers merit classification under CTI 85176290 due to their independent operational capabilities and alignment with the HSN Explanatory Notes.

Eligibility for Concessional Rate of Duty

- Relevant Legal Framework: Notification No. 57/2017-Cus. provides concessional duty rates for certain goods, excluding specific categories such as Optical Transport Equipment (OTE) and Optical Transport Network (OTN) products.

- Court's Interpretation and Reasoning: The Court differentiated between optical and electrical SFP Transceivers. Optical SFP Transceivers, being part of OTE/OTN products, fall under the exclusion category of the notification, while electrical SFP Transceivers do not.

- Key Evidence and Findings: The Court noted that optical transceivers convert electrical signals to optical signals and vice versa, aligning them with OTE/OTN products. In contrast, electrical transceivers using copper cables do not fit this category.

- Application of Law to Facts: Based on the notification's exclusions, optical SFP Transceivers are not eligible for concessional duty, whereas electrical SFP Transceivers qualify for the concessional rate.

- Treatment of Competing Arguments: The Court considered the applicant's argument that the classification should not be influenced by external power requirements or device insertion, focusing instead on the primary function of the transceivers.

- Conclusions: Optical SFP Transceivers are ineligible for concessional duty under the notification, while electrical SFP Transceivers are eligible.

SIGNIFICANT HOLDINGS

- Core Principles Established: The classification of goods under the Customs Tariff should focus on their independent functionality and alignment with HSN Explanatory Notes. The distinction between parts and complete machines is crucial in determining classification.

- Final Determinations on Each Issue: The Court ruled that SFP Transceivers are classifiable under CTI 85176290. Optical SFP Transceivers are not eligible for concessional duty under Notification No. 57/2017-Cus., while electrical SFP Transceivers are eligible.

- Verbatim Quote: "The product i.e. Small Form-factor Pluggable (SFP) Transceiver merit classification under CTSH 851762 (Machines for the reception, conversion and transmission or regeneration of voice, images or other data, including switching and routing apparatus), more specifically under CTI 85176290 (Other) of the First Schedule of Customs Tariff Act, 1975."

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates